Your buddy, Dale,
would make a better president than anybody who is currently running for that
office. He doesn’t toe anybody’s party line. He looks at each issue on its own
merits; uses logic and common sense to make his own decisions on those issues. He
thinks, rather than simply putting the pegs into the holes where he is
instructed to place them. This is why Dale would make a better president; and
this is why he will never hold that office.
Who can trust a
guy like that? Who can afford to lay out all that money, just on the off-chance
that every decision he makes will coincide with their financial interests?
Purchasing the office of President – or any national office, really – is expensive
business. Any potential contender who doesn’t have virtually unlimited cash
behind him/her doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of winning. With the restrictions on campaign contributions
all but gone, it’s not the people of this country – you or Dale – who decide
who’ll be at the helm, it’s the money. The money tells the minions what to
think, and for whom they should vote. And the minions believe them – because what
choice do they have? And when somebody gives you lots of money, they’re going
to expect something in return. No. Not something. Everything.
Corporations are people. Young people – since their inclusion into
that category only came about with Citizens United in 2010 – but people, just
the same. So says the Supreme Court. These young people are very rich, which
makes them very powerful in our current political system. They pick candidates who can (and promise) do
the most for them, and pour their money in behind those candidates. It’s a bit of a gamble. If their guy wins,
they’ll get their cash back, many times over.
If their guy loses, it’s not really a big deal because somebody else
with money had to have made that happen. That other young person’s financial
interests couldn’t be that much
different. Money wins. Money makes more money. Everybody’s happy. Well, except maybe the
little guy, who aligned himself with one of these young citizens; fought in the
trenches for them; gave them his vote, his blood, thinking, somehow, his life would
be better for the effort. It rarely is.
So, not knowing what else to do, the little guy licks his wounds and
tries to survive until the next election, when he will have an opportunity to
make a better choice. He rarely does.
Here’s where it
gets complicated. There are a whole damn
lot more little guys than there are big corporations. If all of the little guys banded together to
watch out for their own interests, like the corporations do, their collective
voice could be even louder. But it’s
hard being a little guy. Somehow,
somewhere up the food chain, practically all little guys are tantamount to
servants of the corporations. Little guy
is afraid to step out of line for fear of retribution from his master. He doesn’t have a golden parachute to break
his fall, so he abides. And the cycle
continues. And the rich get richer. And the little guy ultimately accepts his role
on the chess board and surrenders.
Big money has many
faces: business, religion, the war machine, to name a few. But, make no
mistake, all of them are big money – the kings and queens and the bishops and
knights who serve them directly – expecting, demanding, that you little guys
get out in front of them and clear the way. When you fall, there will always be
more little guys to take your place when the next battle commences. Even though
you’re laying off the board in a little pile on the table, you get about a
50/50 shot at saying your side won. So, you’ve got that going for you.
There is no such
thing as a democracy, in the context of world governments. We used to consider
our form of government as a “representative democracy.” For quite a while, the
United States has actually worked in what can best be described as a “constitutional
republic.” The tint of that republic changes from election to election, as various
faces of big money persuades the pawns to vote for big money’s benefit. In the last few decades, we have moved closer
to what could only be described as an “oligarchy” – where, in essence, a few
(big money) govern over many (the little guy). Some big money is more
transparent than others. If Trump, or
Walker (aka Koch Brothers) – the business face of big money - should win the
next election, the republic will temporarily take a giant step toward a “plutocracy.”
This is a government controlled by a few
wealthy people, and many will argue that we are already there. But with these
guys, the mask is off, and we can quit pretending to be anything else.
Huckabee and Cruz
rely on another face of big money. Their election would undoubtedly move us
toward a “theocracy.” This is a
government by immediate divine
guidance or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided – meaning the
Church (the Christian Church and nothing but the Church) would essentially be
making our governmental decisions. After all, it would take a divine miracle
for either of them to get elected. The question then would become which branch
of the business of Christianity would make the calls. The answer would be
Southern Baptist.
Bernie Sanders is a self-described Democratic
Socialist. That term scares the hell out of a whole lot of people in the United
States who only hear the “socialist” part, bringing to mind the evil empires of
Russia and China we all grew up learning to hate and fear. Here’s the actual definition: Democratic
socialism is a political ideology advocating a democratic political
system alongside a socialist economic system, involving a combination of
political democracy with social ownership of the means of production. Sometimes
used synonymously with "socialism", the adjective
"democratic" is added to denote a system of political democracy
similar to that found in existing Western societies.
Take that as you will, but it means Bernie
would move the country, if even slightly, toward that socialist boogeyman.
Frustrated that nothing we’ve tried before
has actually given us the government we think we should have, no matter which
side we sit on, judging from the polls, Americans are faunching at the bits for
some kind of dramatic change in our particular directions. The right wants to go way to the right
(Donald Trump, Scott Walker). The left wants to go way to the left (Bernie
Sanders). Everybody pretty much assumes that the election of Hillary Clinton or
Jeb Bush would just keep us in more or less the same place we are now. The truth is, no matter which direction we go,
we’ll come back toward the middle the next time, and we’ll remain a Plutocracy,
ruled by one face or the other of big money.
This is, until the little guys
rise up and demand that we reform our political system back to exclude big
money; where each flesh & blood human’s vote actually matters and we’re not
all bombarded by dollars on the airwaves and the newsprint and the internet
telling us how to vote.
Until then, we get what we vote for.
Meaning we get what we want. What do you want? You’re not as radical as you’ve
been told you should be.
©2015 Rick Baber
No comments:
Post a Comment